<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Goes DKIM In 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theemailwars.com/2008/11/19/aol-goes-dkim-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theemailwars.com/2008/11/19/aol-goes-dkim-in-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://theemailwars.com/2008/11/19/aol-goes-dkim-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theemailwars.com/?p=1316#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Ah, if it were only so simple. DKIM allows lots of flexibility for the signing domain. I&#039;m curious what you&#039;d suggest for a DKIM-Signature line and how it would relate to the From header (RFC2822/5322/IMF).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, if it were only so simple. DKIM allows lots of flexibility for the signing domain. I&#8217;m curious what you&#8217;d suggest for a DKIM-Signature line and how it would relate to the From header (RFC2822/5322/IMF).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
