Germans, Dutch eye stricter Web laws

Feb 26 2007

What if it was illegal to actually set up or represent your email address with false information? This is an interesting law finding traction in Europe. I am not quite sure how this would be policed, but it sure would help email marketers from having bad lists and email false positive rates with the ISPs. Just how many of you are barraged with false email addresses at sign up each day? And how many of you have to constantly monitor your lists to keep them clean?

Some European countries are proposing outlawing the use of fake information to open e-mail accounts or set up Web sites, a move intended to help terror investigations but which could face resistance on a privacy-conscious continent.

The German and Dutch governments have taken the lead on the proposals, crafting legislation that would make it illegal to provide false information to Internet service providers and require phone companies to save detailed records on customer usage.

The aim, analysts say, is to make it easier for law enforcement to access information when they investigate crimes or terrorist attacks. But Europeans have long cherished their privacy, railing against measures that would see personal information stored for commercial use or government examination.

Read the Article

Published in The Spam Cops on Monday, February 26th, 2007   

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

One Response

  1. 1
    Al says:

    I don’t think it would prevent forged signups. Even if everybody tracked source IP (and not enough people do), it would stop people from using a public computer at a bar, coffee shop, or library to submit spamtraps or who knows what else.

    Also, who’s going to pay for the resources required to prosecute these forgeries? Not all crimes are prosecuted equally.

    ——————————————-

    I, like you, think it is an interesting idea, but I would think that this will never see the light of day. And if it did, how the heck can they police it? Right?